Description: The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) is a item scale for measuring negative attitudes about the future. Beck originally developed this scale in. The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) is an instrument for assessing cognitive thoughts among suicidal persons. Previous studies have. Abstract The aim of the present study was to assess the factor structure of the Italian version of the Beck Hopelessness Scale. (BHS) in a large sample of patients.

The BHS acts as a powerful predictor of suicidal intent. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Retrieved October 16, Customers selecting this option must manually enter data in order for scores and reports to be generated. Beck that was designed to measure three major aspects of hopelessness: My Account My Basket 0 items: Product finder Psychological Assessments: Find your nearest representative.

Beck hopelessness scale pdf. Free Pdf Download But after burning so many coaster, I d rather not. How do I disable Amber Alerts on my Nokia Lumia 635. Behringer MX3242X user manual online. 484 GMT -6 00 You may transform your old dress to glow with a novel touch with fun designs. 2008-04-13 14 41 17,664 -a-c- c windows system32 dllcache ppa3. Manual for the Beck Hopelessness Scale. San Antonio, TX Psychological Corporation. Broadcast beck hopelessness scale construct validity of the beck as capably as evaluation them wherever you are now. ManyBooks is another free eBook website that scours the Internet to find the greatest and latest in free Kindle books. Currently, there are over 50,000 free eBooks here.

The hopelessnesd option is to pay per-report. If your required component is not listed, please contact Customer Services on: An established view is that it reflects a unitary or bidimensional construct in nonclinical samples. Customers who administer this assessment only a few times each year, or those who want the flexibility to pay only as the assessment is used, may prefer this option.

Beck Hopelessness Scale

Secure and affordable, this system helps you quickly and automatically organise information, generate scores, and produce accurate, comprehensive reports. Affective measures and personality tests”, Phoenix, AZ: Clinical psychology tests Medical scales Rating scales for depression.

Manual Administration Kits Complete kit: Find your nearest representative for advice on your assessment needs. The second option is to select an “unlimited use” subscription, where one user of this assessment gets unlimited scoring hopelessnrss reporting for a year.

Norms are available for suicidal patients and depressed patients and drug abusers. There are, however, reasons to reconsider this conceptualization. Views Read Edit View history. Our Sales Consultants are available to provide further information on our products.

Beck Hopelessness Scale® (BHS®) | Pearson Assessment

It is not designed for use as a measure of the hopelessness construct but has been used as such. Two options for scoring and reporting are now available on Q-global: It may be used as an indicator of suicidal risk in depressed people who have made suicide attempts. It may be administered and scored by paraprofessionals; but must be used and interpreted only by scald trained professionals, who can employ psychotherapeutic interventions.

A 3-factor solution with 2 method effects i.

Beck Hopelessness Scale® (BHS®)

Browser does not support script. In the scale became the subject of a much circulated DMCA notice that resulted in the temporary shutdown of 1. Feelings about the future Loss of motivation Expectations.

Change the quantities of your desired products, then click “Add to basket”.

The results provide statistical support for a 3-trait and 2-method factor model, and hence the 3 dimensions of hopelessness theorized by Beck. Sufficient data about the use of the test with those younger than 17 has not been collected.

This may be a better option for customers who administer this measure several times each year – and don’t want to worry about keeping track of their report expenses.

Rating scales for depression. The reliability of this conceptualization was supported by McDonald’s coefficient omega and the differential relationships exhibited between the 3 hopelessness factors “feelings about the future,” “loss of motivation,” and “future expectations” and measures of goal disengagement, brooding rumination, suicide ideation, and suicide attempt history.

Dowd [4] and Owen [5] both positively reviewed the effectiveness of the instrument, with Dowd concluding that the BHS was “a well-constructed and validated instrument, with adequate reliability”. It measures the extent of the respondent’s negative attitudes, or pessimism, about the future.

Please note there is no onscreen administration included in the scoring subscription. Sixteen distinct factor models were specified and tested using conventional confirmatory factor analytic techniques, along with confirmatory bifactor modeling. Measure three major aspects of hopelessness: The test is multiple choice.

Aaron T Beck. Price list Add To Basket. There is considerable debate about the underlying factor hopelessnesa of the Beck Hopelessness Scale BHS in the literature. Retrieved from ” https:

Special recommendations for administering the BHS via telepractice

» Get general information about telepractice from Pearson Clinical Assessment.

The telepractice information below is intended to support professionals in making informed, well-reasoned decisions around remote assessment. This information is not intended to be comprehensive regarding all considerations for assessment via telepractice. It should not be interpreted as a requirement or recommendation to conduct assessment via telepractice.

Professionals should remain mindful to:

• Follow professional best practice recommendations and respective ethical codes
• Follow telepractice regulations and legal requirements from federal, state and local authorities, licensing boards, professional liability insurance providers, and payors
• Develop competence with assessment via telepractice through activities such as practicing, studying, consulting with other professionals, and engaging in professional development.

Professionals should use their clinical judgment to determine if assessment via telepractice is appropriate for a particular examinee, referral question, and situation. There are circumstances where assessment via telepractice is not feasible and/or is contraindicated. Documentation of all considerations, procedures, and conclusions remains a professional responsibility.

Special recommendations for administering the BHS via telepractice.

Administering any of the Beck Scales in a telepractice context can be accomplished utilizing the On-Screen Administration (OSA) or Remote On-Screen Administration (R-OSA) function of Q-global® , Pearson’s secure online testing and scoring platform.. Details regarding the system and how it is used are provided on the Q-global product page.

Conducting a valid assessment in a telepractice modality requires an understanding of the interplay of a number of complex issues. In addition to the general information on our telepractice overview page noted above, professionals should address five themes (Eichstadt et al. 2013) when planning for administering the Beck Scales via telepractice: For more information on the five themes, please visit our general telepractice web page.

Theme-specific information for forced-choice assessment administrations and the BHS

1. Audio/visual environment

Bhs Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual

• If you require video viewing during the administration, make sure the full face of the examinee is in view.
  
• If you require audio interaction during the administration, make sure the audio is working as expected. Test the audio prior to the administration either through the examinee’s speakers or headset and ensure a high-quality audio environment is present.
  
• Make sure the examinee's environment is free from distractions.

2. Examiner factors

• Practice the mechanics and workflow of assigning, starting, and completing the assessment using the On-Screen Administration capabilities of Q-global (or Remote On-Screen if being used) before you go through this process with an examinee so that you are familiar with the administration procedures.
  
• If you are asking the examinee to complete the assessment during a telepractice session while you are observing virtually, please note the audio/visual environment information above, and ensure that the session is set up appropriately to elicit a valid response from the examinee. Be sure to also ensure that the test taking session mimics an in-person session as closely as possible.

3. Examinee factors

• Please ensure that a remote assessment administration is appropriate for the client and for the purpose of the assessment.
  
• Ensure that examinee is able and prepared to appropriately engage in the testing session and that they are well rested, can adequately attend to the test, and are ready to fully participate in the test session.
  
• There may be some administrations where an examinee headset is not appropriate or feasible. In these instances, make sure you have a web camera with an embedded microphone or a standalone microphone with the volume turned up to a comfortable level.

4. Test/test materials

• Ask the examinee to close all other applications on the computer, laptop, or other device for faster administration performance.
  
• Monitor the test session and the examinee's interaction with the test materials to ensure confidentiality and test session integrity as appropriate

5. Other/miscellaneous

• If you are administering the test using the On-Screen Administration (OSA) function of Q-global while the client is in a remote location, it may be advisable that an e-Helper (para-professional) is onsite with the client to assist with logging in and starting the assessment if the examinee's computer is controlling the session, or to ensure that the appropriate client response is captured if the assessment is being administered via screen sharing/video-conferencing capabilities.
  
• The e-Helper should also be trained in and able to provide emergency assistance should it be required during the test session for any reason, including if the examinee should show any indication of personal distress during the assessment.
  
• Always state in your report that the test was administered via telepractice, and briefly describe the method of telepractice used. For example, 'The BHS was administered by remote on-screen administration through the Q-global system, and the examiner's assistant monitored the administration using a live video connection'.
  
• Make a clinical judgment, similar to a face-to-face session, whether or not you are able to gather the examinee's best performance. Report your clinical decision(s) in your report and comment on the factors that led to this decision and your reporting or lack of reporting of the scores. For example, 'The remote testing environment appeared free of distractions, adequate rapport was established with the examinee via video and s/he appeared appropriately engaged in the task throughout the session. No significant technological problems were noted during administration, and the results are considered to be a valid estimate of the examinee's skills/abilities'

Selected research to date

Please refer to the following studies regarding the appropriateness of administering forced-choice assessments via computer or other electronic means.

Chuah et al (2006). Personality Assessment: Does the Medium Matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40-4, 339-376.

Butcher, J., Perry, J., & Hahn, J. (2004). Computers in clinical assessment: Historical developments, present status, and future challenges. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 331-345.

Pinsoneault, Terry B. (1996) Equivalency of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil administered version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2.Computers in Human Behavior, 12-2, 291-300.

Russell M. et al (2003). Computer-Based Testing and Validity: A Look Back and into the Future. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College

Studies supporting the equivalency of test scores when picture stimuli are displayed to the examinee in a printed manual versus a digital display on a computer screen (in-person administration):

Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual

Daniel, M. H., Wahlstrom, D., & Zhou, X. (2014). Equivalence of Q-interactive and paper administrations of language tasks: Selected CELF-5 tests. Q-interactive Technical Report 7. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Daniel, M. H. (2012a). Equivalence of Q-interactive administered cognitive tasks: WAIS–IV. Q-interactive Technical Report 1. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Daniel, M. H. (2012b). Equivalence of Q-interactive administered cognitive tasks: WISC–IV. Q-interactive Technical Report 2. Bloomington, MN: Pearson.

Conclusion

Provided that you have thoroughly considered and addressed all the factors and specific considerations listed above, the examiner should be prepared to comment about the reliable and valid delivery of the test via remote delivery. Document in your report that the administration was completed by telepractice.

You may use the BHS via telepractice without additional permission from Pearson in the following published context:

• BHS On-Screen Administration (OSA) or Remote On-Screen Administration (ROSA) via Q-global [tests with OSA/ROSA options] (3/18/2020)
  

Beck Anxiety Inventory

Any other use of the BHS via telepractice requires prior permission from Pearson.